Continued from Part 1.

A Theological Basis for Simplicity

There is a black and white simple church that calls things the way they see them. There is a gray simple church that is willing to do mission in the mess of life, far from the safety of doctrinal and traditional towers. The gray simple does not abandon theological conviction or absolute truth, but works to convey their conviction in ways that are digestible and contextual.

But why simple? Lamin Sanneh offers a staggering simplicity in this phrase: incarnation is translation. By this he means that in becoming flesh, Jesus translated divinity into cultural form. Theologians have debated the complexity of this phenomenon for centuries. Consider Philippians 2, as an example. Whatever you make of the incarnation, it communicates a single, simple reality. God is translatable, just as the Bible is translatable. God was touchable in Jesus: he ate, he slept, he walked, he talked. In many respects, he communicated the complexity of divinity in simplicity, so that even common fishermen could catch on. This is the task of the church—communicating the complexity of the gospel in simplicity so that our people can catch on.

Simply Gray

Oliver Wendell Holmes captures the search for gray simple very well: "I would not give a fig for the simplicity this side of complexity, but I would give my life for the simplicity the other side of complexity."

As a church, we are constantly striving for the other side of complexity. In fact, I am in the process of reducing our core values to three statements. My original prospectus for Austin City Life has undergone a hundred revisions, most of them in space and time, not paper and ink. This is primarily because we are trying to faithfully adjust our methodology to our missiology, and to be the church that follows the Spirit through unplanned change and unchanging gospel conviction.

We will be releasing a new 2.0 website this year that attempts to communicate our vision and mission as a people even more simply. We are refining and maintaining a simple discipleship structure along which our church can grow. Our missional spaces are increasingly strategic and well-defined. I hope we never tarry in this task of simple church, for the sake of making the incarnation translation.

Resurgence on Facebook:

Become a fan of the Resurgence on Facebook, get connected with other fans, and stay current on all the latest updates. Find out more.

Talking with our staff last week, I was further convinced of the value of simplicity. We have made some significant changes along the way that have pushed us into being simply the church. I have not read the book Simple Church, but as I see it there are two kinds of simplicity: one that ignores complexity and the other that understands complexity. It is the latter that is shaping our church.

Black & White Simple

The first kind of simple church ignores complexity. This kind of church calls it as they see it. There is one way to do things. They call the outs. This type of "simple church" refuses to frame the gospel in our context, insisting upon using old forms for new times. Like the missionary who exports Western pews, pictures, and pet theologies, simple churches that ignore cultural complexity produce disciples and doctrines that disconnect from the people they are trying to reach. They are simple in missiology, but also in theology. These churches assert that "if we would just interpret the Bible literally," we would all have the same theology. This simplicity ignores the complexity of biblical theology, revelation embedded in history, and culture that alternately affirms and contradicts its historical-cultural context. This kind of simplicity is not what we seek.

Gray Simple

There is another kind of simple church that understands complexity. This kind of church realizes that things are not always what they appear. To use baseball terms, these churches understand that what appears as an "out" to some may appear as "safe" to others. They realize there are two ways to spell gray. This kind of simple church embraces cultural change in a carefully critical way. When carefully considered, the embrace of these changes communicates the gospel faithfully within complex cultural shifts. People understand that the difference between "the world" and "the church" is not black and white. They strive to bring Scripture into the gray context of culture and their relationships. As a result, these churches are constantly theologizing. They realize that theology is not inspired and neither are they. They struggle to take inspired stories, letters, and gospels and learn how to bring them to life in variously delightful and decadent cultures. This process forces them to deal with the complexity of suffering, human flourishing, common grace, and human indifference and come through the other side with a simple, accessible, thoughtful, and replicable way of following Jesus.

RSS Feed:

Subscribe to the Resurgence syndicated feed and have all our content delivered straight to your feed reader. Find out more.